We often hear the same questions and concerns from patients curious about Dysport. As one of the leading neurotoxins for smoothing fine lines and wrinkles, Dysport is frequently compared to BOTOX®—yet myths continue to circulate online and in conversations.
If you’re considering Dysport injections to minimize wrinkles, it’s time to separate fact from fiction. Here are the top 4 myths about Dysport—and the truth behind them.
Myth #1: Dysport Spreads Too Much and Looks Unnatural
Truth: Dysport is formulated with a slightly smaller protein structure than BOTOX, allowing it to spread more easily. While this can sound like a drawback, it’s actually a benefit in the hands of an experienced injector. Dysport’s diffusion makes it ideal for treating larger areas like the forehead or crow’s feet with fewer injections.
At Dallas Center for Dermatology and Aesthetics, our board-certified dermatologists precisely tailor each treatment to ensure smooth, natural-looking results. Unwanted spread only occurs when injectors lack training or use too much of the product—not because of Dysport itself.
Myth #2: Dysport Doesn’t Last as Long as BOTOX
Truth: Patients concerned about the duration of their results often ask, “Does Dysport last longer than BOTOX?” Dysport typically lasts 3 to 4 months, similar to BOTOX. The duration of results depends more on your metabolism, the treatment area, and dosage than the product brand itself. Some patients even say they see results sooner with Dysport—often within 2 to 3 days of their appointment, compared to the 7 to 14 days typical of BOTOX.
Myth #3: Dysport Doesn’t Work the Same for Men and Women
Truth: Dysport works the same way in both men and women—it relaxes the underlying muscles that cause dynamic wrinkles. The key difference is that men typically have stronger facial muscles, requiring slightly more units to achieve the same smoothing effect.
Our injectors consider gender, muscle strength, and facial anatomy during every consultation to ensure personalized, effective results for everyone.
Myth #4: Dysport Isn’t as Effective as BOTOX
Truth: Both Dysport and BOTOX contain botulinum toxin type A and are approved by the FDA for treating fine lines and wrinkles. Dysport’s safety and effectiveness are well-documented.
Some patients even find that Dysport offers a softer, more natural look, especially for areas that benefit from wider diffusion. It’s not about one being “better” than the other—it’s about choosing what best aligns with your goals and anatomy.
Dysport vs. BOTOX: What’s the Difference?
Here’s a quick comparison to help you decide:
| Feature | Dysport | BOTOX |
| Onset of Results | 2–3 days | 7-14 days |
| Duration | 3–4 months | 3–4 months |
| Best For | Larger areas, softer diffusion | Smaller areas, precise targeting |
| Unit Dosage | More units per area (less potent per unit) | Fewer units (more potent per unit) |
| Feel | Natural, blended look | Defined, more targeted look |
Choosing between Dysport and BOTOX often depends on your facial anatomy, personal preferences, and desired results. At your consultation, our team will help you determine the right option for your skin and lifestyle. You can also learn more about the differences between BOTOX and Dysport in one of our earlier blog posts.
Feel Confident in Your Choice
Whether you’re new to injectables or considering a switch, Dysport offers safe, natural-looking results when administered by experienced professionals. We specialize in personalized aesthetic care at Dallas Center for Dermatology and Aesthetics, ensuring every treatment supports your individual beauty goals. You can request a consultation using the online form or call us at (214) 631-7546 to schedule an appointment.
Leave a Reply